youth empowerment Archive

Canadian Parliament Supports Strong Copenhagen Target

November 26th, 2009

“Lead, follow, or get out of the way!”, was what Power Shift Canada told the Canadian Government loud and clear on October 24th. Since then, youth across the country have been rallying, calling and dancing to demand that the Canadian government adopt Bill C-311 (the Climate Change Accountability act) which would mandate targets to cut global warming pollution in line with science. “It’s time to listen,” we told them, and all these efforts have finally started to pay off. The minority Harper government used stalling tactics to delay a vote on that bill in committee most likely until 2010, but the Canadian parliament just passed a motion that Canada should put forward the first target from the delayed bill as the Canadian position in Copenhagen. It passed 137-124 with the united support of all three opposition parties:

That, in the opinion of the House, Canada should commit to propose at the Copenhagen conference on climate change

  1. reducing, through absolute reduction targets, greenhouse gas emissions in industrialized countries to 25% lower than 1990 levels, by 2020;
  2. the necessity of limiting the rise in global temperatures to less than 2oC higher than in the preindustrial era; and
  3. supporting the developing countries in their efforts to reduce greenhouse gases and adapt to climate change.

The motion isn’t legally binding, unfortunately, like bill C-311 would be, but it does send an important and powerful message to the world: the current Canadian government’s position on climate change does not represent the will of the majority of Canadians, and the opposition parties are willing to unite against the government over this issue. This gives a huge boost to those countries who are willing to push forward towards an ambitious, binding treaty in Copenhagen, and they should take note: the Harper government is now totally wrongfooted on their climate policy, and barely hanging on to power by a thread. Lead, and Canada will follow.

Originally published at itsgettinghotinhere.org

Radical Energy Saving Action

December 7th, 2006

When the going gets tough, and people remain ambivalent towards the simple steps they can take in their lives to reduce their energy use, it seems there’s only one thing for it… It’s time to start breaking into people’s apartments, changing their light bulbs, dropping bricks in their toilets, and switching off their appliances by stealth, obviously! ;)

Youth Caucus Statement on CSD13 Draft Decisions

April 15th, 2005

We were up late last night. The youth caucus spent the afternoon reviewing the draft decisions from CSD13 and it’s not great at the moment. For one there are no time frames, and very few specifics as to how the goals on water, sanitation and human settlements would be achieved. That’s what we’re supposed to be here for. As well as pulling the text apart, and writing out what we see as being the key points that are missing from the text, a small group worked late into the night drafting a statment for this morning’s opening session. We tried really hard to get all of the points we saw as important to be changed into the statement, but this morning we timed it with emmanual, who read the statement, and we had to make some fairly drastic cuts to get it within the time limit. That was a shame — we had so much to say, and not enough time to make our important points. (Also, in the last minute editing, some points we had agreed were important got cut by mistake.) We distributed the statement, and the longer document of all our lobbying points on the text, to all the governments and have been lobbying much of the day. The statement went across quite well, and we found our points in line with a number of the other Major Group statements. The NGOs’ statement was especially hard-hitting, criticising the lack of specific mechanisms and commitments by governments. It’s a shame we didn’t manage to make our statement stronger, but there’s a limit to what you can do at 4am

Anyway, here is the statement, and the lobbying points

Time to Lobby

April 15th, 2005

For the last three days, governments, NGOs and other civil society groups have been presenting their positions on Water, Sanitation and Human Settlements. Some of the dialogue has been quite interesting, and also for the first time in a number of years there hasn’t been a specific slot allocated to the Major Groups’ (civil society) statements. There’s been a mixed response to this. The chairs of the plennary sessions have both been quite good at doing what they promissed, and including Major Group responses and comments along with the governments’ statements. On the other hand, this sets a bit of a precedent for future years, and a number of people are concerned that if the chairs of the sessions at future CSDs want, they could easily now exclude civil society input. That would be a huge step backwards, and something we have to avoid.

In terms of the actual issues, I’m finding it rather difficult not having much experience dealing with water, sanitation and human settlements — very much development oriented topics — a long way from the climate change, energy, and environmental justice issues I spent most of my time in Johannesburg fighting for. That said, it’s been useful to be able to really focus my time on supporting everyone else in the youth caucus (many of who know much more than me about these issues) pass on the knowledge I’ve aquired over the last three years, especially to Neela and Elissa who are both representing youth on the official government delegations for the UK and Canada this year.

I’ve also had some really useful conversations with people in the UN Youth Unit about youth involvement in the UN, especially the run up to the Millenium +5 summit in September focussing on the Millenium Development Goals (the theme for Global Village) and also the 60th General Assembly in October. More about that another time.

The draft of the decisions for the CSD was released this morning, and we spent all day going through the document, which was remarkably short; the length alone made me really question how it can possibly represent a plan to sort out three such huge issues. Government delegations and the other Major Groups also spent all day pouring over the document, comparing notes, and looking at how much of what we’ve been calling for made it into the first draft.

I’ll post the Youth Caucus key points first thing tomorrow, but here are a few interesting points to note…

A rights-based approach to water provision is in there. This is something we’re going to have to fight like crazy to keep — many of the governments are against an international agreement that has any language in that could be interpreted as giving people the right to water. It sounds incredible, but it’s true, since the right to water would put some serious brakes on the current privatisation trend, and (potentially) create some issues where water supplies exist across national boundaries. This whole process is supposed to be about cooperating to solve the world’s problems, but in reality the governments do nothing more than stick up for their own best interests.

There is almost no mention of the cross-cutting issues that we’re supposed to be taking into account when looking at all of the themes addressed by CSD. It’s sad, but every year in the youth caucus we seem to be one of the few groups standing up and drawing the governments’ attention to the hugely unsustainable impacts of militarisation. Nowhere could this be more apparent than in the areas of water, sanitation and human settlements, all of which are devistated by war. With climate change, I keep explaining to people how it doesn’t matter what progress we make in a number of the world’s more pressing issues, such as access to safe drinking water, if we don’t start dealing with climate change, but the very same analysis is true of conflict — peace is sustainable, and we’ll be making that point tomorrow.

That brings me nicely onto what’s happening next (although I’ve been writing rather aimlessly because it’s late!) Today we assembled all of the key points we think are missing from the draft decision paper, and tomorrow we have the opportunity to make a brief statement to the governments. Emmanuel from Ghana will make the statement (he’s one of the few representatives from the global south here, thanks to some funding we managed to get to at least have a slightly more representative youth caucus.) We will be focussing on some of the issues I just mentioned, and also putting forward some specific changes we’d like to see in the text.

From then on it’s serious lobbying to get support for our points from as many of the government representatives as possible. If we can get a government to put changes into the final decision document for us (since we can’t input the changes directly, unfortunately) then maybe we can get the commitments from governments to be a bit more progressive. That, and fight to keep the good stuff that’s in there already, which some governments, especially the US, will without doubt try to water down or remove entirely.

So that’s my overview of where things are now. Neela is doing a great job on the UK delegation — although the civil society reps on the UK delegation don’t have as much input as on some other government delegations from what I can tell. It’s great having her here, and having that connection between the Youth Caucus and the UK government.

Here is the draft chairman’s text in full (hold on to your browsers, it’s a few pages…)

CSD13 Wednesday Report

April 14th, 2005

Neela’s report from Wednesday…

Day Three.
The United Nations in New York.
UK Youth Delegate at the Commission for Sustainable Development.

It’s 8 O’clock and I’m just back at the hotel cooking some dinner. MTV is on, but i haven’t yet seen any music for adverts so I’m a little confused. Tonight there isn’t any Youth Caucus work to do because we are awaiting the chair’s draft of the text. By 9am tomorrow morning there will be a draft document that will be a compromise about all the statements that goverments and civil society have made over the last few days. The days of talking about possible policies are over and we now enter into a phase of negotiation. Tomorrow everybody will be reading through the chair’s draft to see if their views are represented. If views and policies are not included then it is time to lobby governments and make them bring the issue up in negotiation. For example, if there is no mention of the importance of peer to peer education in the effort to educate about sanitation then the Youth Caucus will be lobbying different governments, asking them the push for it’s inclusion.

This whole process is going to be fastinating to be a part of. The Youth Caucus are meeting at 9 to start working through the text and working out how we feel about it. The text will all be writen in offical language, and we will help each other understand exactly what it all means. This is why it is so important to have lots of youth in the Youth Caucus because everyone has different skills and can help in different ways.

This is something that i have been thinking about a lot in the last few days: the representation within the youth caucus. Very few governements actually have a position for a youth delegate on their delegation, and these are mostly from developed countries. Germany and the Netherlands are particually progressive and have two youth delegates. The US doesn’t have one but lots of young people from the States still join the Youth Caucus by representing different youth groups. It is particually easy (and cheaper) for US youth to get involved. This means that the Youth Caucus mainly has input from developed countries in the northern hemisphere. It is therefore understandable that our knowledge about how youth around the world feel about issues like water, sanitation and settlements is limited. I am sure that the Youth Cuacus would be greatly benifit if there were young people from developed and undeveloped countries. One idea has been to ask governement who already have youth delegates to pay for a youth delegate from another country. This is something i will be asking the UK government about tomorrow if i get time. Although, they don’t even pay for me to attend: this is up to my youth group to organise. If the UK government won’t consider this option, then i will ask them to remind all other countries that various resolutions have been passed stating the importance of Youth Representation in the UN.

I was meant to have a brief meeting with one of the UK team today, but it didn’t materialise. So instead I found a computer and wrote up some points and questions that i would like to know about. Because i am the first ever Youth Delegate that the UK has allowed to attend this event, i want to make sure that i know WHY I am here, in their eyes, and what i can do to make sure the role exists for other young people. Some of the questions i wrote about were:

1) What role does the UK see it’s Youth delegate playing at CSD13 (commission for sustainable development) and beyond?
2) How can a mentoring system be set up to support the other young people who will be youth delegates.
3) Can the UK put pressure on other governements to bring a youth delegate, and support them in doing so where possible?

I also made it clear that it would be a great shame if the role of ‘youth delegate’ became merely tokenistic. Hopefully they will realise that this is not why i came to New York! Despite this missed meeting, i spoke to some of the other UK delegates and am beginning to feel a little more comfortable talking to them about my feelings. It is easy to feel like you are the only person who doesn’t always understand what is going on: but for many adults this is their first UN experience as well. Then it was lunch time, and i got a little lost. I turned a corner from the escalators and there were people lining the walls of the corridor. I asked why everyone was waiting, and someone pointed at Bill Clinton strolling towards us with his entourage. For me it was like seeing something out of madame tusaudes come alive: those wax models are very accurate. And then he turned a corner and he was gone. Lunch time! I find out the Britney Spears is pregnant.

The afternoon sessions were all about the issues that link water, sanitation and settlements together. For example: the effects of warfare on young people around the world. The use of radioactive weapons can damages water resources for generations to come, destabilise ecological and social systems. Human settelments are also greatly effected by this footprint of warfare. These are the kinds of issue that the Youth Cuacus will hope to find mentioned in the chair’s text tomorrow. We made an intervention about the interlinking issues that we think are most important, and hopefully the chair will have taken note of them. I then went to a meeting run by the UN Youth Unit (youth@un.org). They support governments in getting youth involvement. Just for the record: the UK is planning on taking three youth delegates to the General Assembly conference in October. So if you are interested, then check out the website: http://www.unysa-uk.org

Paris and Nicole Hilton are currently on TV using baby orangutangs to advertise Burger King. Apparently it’s becasue they are an endangered species (the oranutangs not the Hiltons, sadly), and they want to promote the cause. Nice to know that youth around the world are doing their bit! Watching their lifestyle of luxury and playgrounds is slightly sickening when you have just spent the whole day wondering why millions of kids still don’t have access to clean water. I wish it were greed that was endangered.

I hope that these messages are useful. If there is anything in particular you want to know or ask you can email me or post a reply, depending where you are accessing it from. There is always so much to write about that i am willing to focus on the things that you are finding most interesting.

till tomorrow, neela



  • Search
  • You are currently browsing the matthewcarroll.ca youth empowerment archive.

  • Meta

  • Old Browser

    It seems you are using an old web browser (e.g. Internet Explorer 5 or below). This is a security risk to you, since Microsoft no longer releases updates for old versions of Internet Explorer. Also, note that this site is designed to modern internet standards, and the layout may appear strange or plain in older browsers. All the content is still accessible to you, but I strongly recommend you upgrade to a modern, safe, standards-complient browser, such as Firefox. For more information on getting the best experience surfing the web, see browsehappy.com.